Shuster WD, Bonta J, Thurston H, Warnemuende E, Smith DR (2005)
Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: a review.
Taibi R (2012) Presentation of the ANRH ABH. Teng J, Jakeman AJ, Vaze J,
Croke BFW, Dutta D, Kim S (2017) Flood inundation modelling:
a review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis.
Thomas W, Baier F, Erbertseder T, Kaästner M (2011) Analysis of the Algerian severe weather
event in November 2001 and its impact on ozone and nitrogen dioxide distributions.
Tramblay Y, El Adlouni S, Servat E (2013) Trends
and variability in extreme precipitation indices over Maghreb countries
Nat Hazards Earth. Yamani K, Hazzab A, Sekkoum M, Slimane T, Korichi K, Hazzab A, Atallah M (2016) Flash floods risk analysis in ephemeral streams: a case study on Wadi Mekerra (northwestern Algeria).
Zaïri Y (2018) <a target="_blank" href="https://t.me/floodservice_bot">flood Email spam</a> risk mapping in the region of Ouled Ben Abdelkader in the
Wilaya of Chlef, Northern Algeria. In, Cham, 2018.
Recent advances in environmental science from the
Euro-Mediterranean and surrounding regions.

I apologize for obsessing about the need for good (in focus!) images, articulate descriptions, and clearly stated questions.
However, I receive many questions that are lacking such basic information which precludes any
useful response. So if a question has incomplete details and no (or blurry) images I will often not respond.
Bottle ID and dating is can be difficult with the bottle/fragment in hand
and, unfortunately, even with good photos and descriptions it is often more difficult.
9). This is true of all bottle books and websites - they can only cover a miniscule number within the huge universe of bottles for which
an overwhelmingly large majority have little or no
published history available. In other words, there is a good chance that the specific bottle you ask about will simply generate a general response about its
approximate manufacturing time period and its typology (i.e., what
the bottle was used for) which is the primary intent and utility of this website anyway.


Verify the authenticity of any email that seems suspicious by contacting the sender directly.
Report any suspicious activity to our IT or security team immediately.

Remember, your online security is in your hands.
Stay alert and follow best practices for online security.
Phishing attacks are a growing threat to online security, but with
the right knowledge and tools, you can protect yourself.
We are pleased to offer a phishing awareness training program to help you learn how to stay safe
online. The training program will cover topics such as how to identify phishing emails, how to avoid falling for phishing attacks, and what to do if
you suspect that you have been targeted. The program includes interactive modules, quizzes, and resources to help you improve your knowledge and skills.
To access the training program, simply click on the link below and enter your login credentials.
We strongly encourage you to take advantage of this opportunity
to improve your online security.

EXPENSES FOR RAISING FUNDS - A - Costs are kept low -
Business design is good enough to attract large contributions and further community trade.
CONTRIBUTORS’CHOICE OF CHARITY - A - Businesses can choose where their money goes.
PROMISE FOR GLOBAL CHANGE - B - The potential for giving back to the community
is substantial - but not everyone have the impetus and the extra energy to impel the change.
TRANSPARENCY - F - According to Intelligent Giving,
there were big questions about accountability as to where the
proceeds of ticket sales went. MARKETING VALUE TO BUSINESS
- B - Business sponsors got good coverage - but it was only
a one time event and it is not easy to test and measure results.

COSTS OF FUNDRAISING - C - Huge amounts were spent on advertising and according to some the whole event was
a damp squib without any actual goals. DONOR’S
CHOICE OF CHARITY - C - Only three charities could manage to get funds.